|

|
[Return to the Classics page
to read a prefatory note on this essay]
The earliest years of infancy are committed
to maternal tenderness by indications which can hardly be mistaken. No mother who knows
that her children require the particular care and protection of any one, can doubt that
the first stages of that care devolve, principally, upon her; though many who acknowledge
the duty, and are devoted to the discharge of it, may not know the best means of
accomplishing their object. Timid in adopting any systematic course of early education
lest it should be wrong, and anxious to do something lest their children should suffer
from their neglect, they commonly adopt and revoke, trace and retrace, do and undo; till,
amidst all these contradictions and conflicting principles, the whole period of life,
which is committed almost exclusively to their care, is wasted in doing nothing
effectually. Yet, however inefficient this fluctuating and often entirely wrong course of
discipline may be, the infancy and childhood of comparatively few of any generation are
blessed with even maternal solicitude as to their education. By far the greater part of
the children of every age and of almost every nation grow up without any instruction from
their parents, except a little aid in the development of such instincts as serve to
preserve their existence. Their whole education, if it may be called by that name, is
drawn from parental examples, which are not always the best, and are often times the most
corrupt; and derived from the influence of surrounding society, which, all will
acknowledge, contains abundantly enough of depravity to corrupt the propensities and
pervert the tender principles of a child. The character of each generation, whatever it
may be, is thus entailed with but slight modifications, upon its successor. And human
reason and discretion have but little to do about it. All the appetites and passions,
which we possess in common with the other animals, come into exercise with out our
efforts, and often in spite of them. While reason and the class of powers, which form
man's distinguishing attributes, are developed but slowly and with the greatest care. The
former, moreover, arrive at full maturity and strength, long before we can raise up the
counteracting power of the latter to direct and control them. What wonder, then, that
mankind make slow progress in improvement, when the current of strong influences sets so
steadily against them!
But the state of society, in which we happen to live, is,
perhaps, as favourably constituted as any on earth, for de riving the full advantage from
a judicious well directed system of domestic education. For almost all have intelligence
enough to understand its influence on the future character of children, and wisdom enough
to appreciate its importance to them. Few, too, are here so depressed with poverty and
want as not to have some opportunities to be improved for this purpose. And comparatively
few have yet run so wild in dissipation and pleasure--that other barbarism--as not to
leave some interstices of time for reflection upon a subject; which, one would suppose;
must be more important to them than any other. Systems of domestic education, however, can
only be improved by an enlightened public opinion, and well informed heads of families
devoted to the subject. To them, particularly to the mother, pertain the duty and the
privilege of conducting the first stages of the education of their family. And both the
Church and the State, in modern times, must be con tent to leave their future pillars in
these hands.
Neither lawgivers, nor the forms of civil society have of ten
interrupted what seems to be so plain a law of nature. Instances are to be found, indeed,
far back in the history of the world, of a violation of it. But they are found in ages,
and amidst institutions, in other respects, very different from our own. The Persian
women, for example, were so far awed by power or influenced by the institutions and
customs of their country, as to yield their children at a very early age, to the care of
the public schools provided for their education. It was not merely to give them up, for a
few hours in a day, to the care of instructers appointed by themselves and subject to
their direction and control. But they were no longer the children of their mothers. The
state or the public adopted them, and assumed the whole business of their future
instruction. The institutions of the Persians, for early education were exceedingly simple
in their organization, and perfectly adapted, as all institutions for similar purposes
should be, to the object, for which they are intended. They seem to have been formed, too,
under a strong conviction of the influence of early discipline. And they were so conducted
as to prepare the children and youth for a faithful and successful discharge of the
duties, which would devolve upon them in the capacity of men. In one respect, certainly,
if no more, hints may be derived from them, useful even to more modern and enlightened
ages. I allude to the attention which they paid to the developement of the physical as
well as of the intellectual and moral powers. As a great part of the lives of the men were
employed in war, in repelling the aggressions of their neighbours, and in making
aggressions upon them; so a great part of their child hood and youth was taken up in
athletic exercises or the appropriate discipline of their bodies Of course, where the
influence of early education is in any degree, understood, the discipline of the young
will have a reference, to what they are to practice when older. And in those states of
society, where muscular force and agility constitute the principal accomplishments of age,
they will be inculcated with the greatest assiduity upon youth.
But of all the ancient lawgivers, Lycurgus
seems most thoroughly to have understood the influence of early education. And he most
successfully turned its influence to account in accomplishing his designs. "What he
thought most conducive to the virtue and happiness of a city," says his biographer,
"was, principles interwoven with the manners and breeding of the people. These would
remain immoveable, as founded in inclination, and be the strongest and most lasting tie ;
and the habits, which education produced in youth, would answer in each the purpose of a
lawgiver. As for smaller matters, contracts about property, and what ever occasionally
varied, it was better not to reduce these to a written form and unalterable method, but to
suffer them to change with the times, and to admit of additions or retrenchments at the
pleasure of persons so well educated. For he resolved the whole business of ligislation
into the bringing up of youth." The Spartan children, therefore, were not under
tutors, purchased or hired with money, nor were the parents at liberty to educate
them as they pleased; but as soon as they were seven years old, Lycurgus ordered
them to be enrolled in companies, where they were all kept under the same order and
discipline, and had their exercises and recreations in common. He, who showed the most
conduct and courage amongst them, was made captain of the company, the rest kept their
eyes on him, obeyed his orders, and bore, with patience, the punishments he inflicted; so
that their whole education was an exercise of obedience. The old men were
present at their diversions, and often suggested some occasions of dispute or quarrel,
that they might observe with exactness, the spirit of each, and their fimness in battle.
From this brief account of the institutions of Lycurgus for the
education of youth it will be seen, that it "was not so much his object to
give a knowledge of a great variety of things, as to form the passions, sentiments, and
ideas to that tone which might best assimilate with the constitutions of the state;
and so to exercise the abilities of both body and mind, as to lead them to the
highest possible capacity for the performance of every thing useful ; particularly
of every thing useful to the commonwealth." By the wisdom and energy of such
a policy, he in a few years, completely transformed the manners, customs, and characters
of the Spartans. From an indolent, luxurious and debauched people, he rendered them
active, temperate and virtuous, according to his ideas of those terms. So firmly, too, had
he established his institutions, and so intimately had he blended their principles with
the very characters and nature of his people, by his system of education; that, by their
own strength, they sustained themselves in healthy and vigorous action, for nearly five
hundred years, after his death. But "the beautiful pile of justice reared by the
pious Numa," says Plutarch, "presently fell to the ground, being without the
cement of education. For Numa left it to the option or convenience of parents, to bring up
their sons to agriculture, to ~'hip-building, to the business of a brazier, or the art of
musician; as if it were not necessary for one design to run through the education of them
all, and for each individual to have the same bias given him; but as if they were all like
passengers in a ship, who coming, each from a different employment and with a different
intent, stand upon their common defence in time of danger, merely out of fear for
themselves, or their property, and on other occasions are attentive only to their private
ends."
Fisher Ames, indeed, in his essays upon the institutions, of
Lycurgus supposes that the number, who received their education in the public schools,
above described, constituted but a very small part of the whole Spartan youth, and that
the rest went at large, like the youth of the other Grecian States with almost no
instruction at all. But whether this theory be true or false is not important to my
present purpose to determine.
No one, I think, who has examined those institutions, in
connexion with the history of Sparta and the other contemporary Grecian states, can doubt,
that, it was by controlling more perfectly the education of the youth, some or all
of them, he gave to her the distinctive national character, which she preserved for so
long a time after him. Whether the Spartan or the Athenian character was the most
perfect according to our notions of the perfection of national character, is quite another
question. The Spartan Law giver made his nation what he wished it to be.
He desired age to be respected at Sparta. He taught the youth this virtue; and age was
respected there. He wished to banish luxury. He taught the youth to despise it; and luxury
was unknown in Sparta. He wished to correct effeminacy. He taught the youth to value
themselves for something else, to emulate each other in acts of hardship; and who could
endure suffering like the Lacedemonians [Spartans]?
This overwhelming influence upon the character of a people, was
not acquired and exercised, by giving to the young, now and then, a moral lecture upon the
respect due to age, upon "the uselessness of luxury," or "the advantages of
a healthy constitution ;" while all these good maxims were constantly contradicted,
and their influence counteracted by every thing seen, and heard, and felt in the examples
of those about them. The young were taught by all they saw to practice the virtues of the
age, without being able to talk of their moral excellence, and perhaps without even
knowing them by a name. Man was then imitative ; and he is now imitative. He will,
therefore, copy what he sees in the examples of others much sooner, than he will practice
what he hears in their precepts. The abstract standard of excellence, too, with the
ancients, was not so far removed from the concrete standard exhibited in the conduct of
men, as it is in modern times; and, of course, the moral lessons founded upon, and drawn
from that standard, were not so liable to be totally wasted, as similar ones are at the
present day. Every thing around, which could be seized upon by the youthful mind as an
example, was then in more perfect keeping, with what was taught them by precept. This
circumstance will account, in some degree, for the greater influence, which the attention
bestowed upon the education of the young seemed then to have, than the same attention
seems now to have. The Spartan Lawgiver influenced his people by means of
early education, more than his contemporaries, only, because he controlled more
perfectly all the associations of childhood and youth. He, and he alone, seemed
thoroughly to understand, and skilfully to turn to his use, that principle of our nature,
which has since been so happily described by Dugald Stewart. "Whoever"
says he, "has the regulation of the associations of another, from earliest
infancy, is, to a great degree, the arbiter of his happiness.
But the associations of the young, in a country, like our own,
cannot be so readily controlled as they could be with the ancients. What could with them
be affected by the decree of a Lawgiver, must now be done by the slower, though not less
powerful influence of public opinion. Where each individual constitutes a part of the
sovereignty of the State, each one must of course he addressed, directly or indirectly,
and convinced of the utility of public measures for improvement. When all this has been
done, steps are taken affecting the interests of society, with as great firmness, and with
as rational a hope of success, as if the process of making up the sovereign will were more
summary.
I have referred to these instances of attention paid to early
education among the ancients, not because I suppose that their institutions are at all
suited to our times, or fit to be adopted in our state of society; but in order to show by
history and example--the safest teachers of human wisdom--the influence of early
education, in a political point of view. Human nature, it is presumed, is not essentially
changed since the empire of the Persians or the days of Lycurgus. And if the
Spartan could mould and transform a nation to suit his own taste, by means of early
education, why may not the same be done at the present day? The children of
modern times are as helpless and as ignorant at birth as were the children of Sparta. If
they have different characters when men, education has made them so. And it may make
another generation as different from the present, as the present one is from the cruel
though heroic Spartans. The silence of history upon the subject, leaves us to infer that
they had five senses; and we, of a more en lightened age, have no more. The wide diversity
in our characters, therefore, has been produced, by what those senses have let into our
minds and hearts, and the various modifications of it, which different circumstances have
made.
The education which we receive from the society in which we live,
is partly beyond, and partly within our own control. The influence of it is much more
important to us, than we commonly suppose. Indeed it makes up far the greater part of our
characters in manhood. We begin to feel its power at birth, and continue to feel it till
death. How, think you, would a Christian teacher succeed in making a good Christian
character of a pupil, if that pupil were surrounded from its cradle by Mussulmen only, and
saw and heard nothing, but what came from them, save the so literary lectures of his
instructor? This view of the subject will enable us, in some degree, to estimate the
extent of the influence of the education of example. Precepts never can, essentially,
counteract the influence of examples; but the latter may and often do, as our daily
observations teach us, counteract the influence of the former. It is not the instructions
of the mother, though she next has the greatest influence, it is not the maxims of the
school master, though he were as wise as Socrates, it is not the sermons and the
exhortations of the pious minister, though he were a perfect saint, which form the
character of the man in any country or in any age. The examples of the society, in which
he grows up, these form his character, and make him what he is when matured in manhood.
If then it is by the power of the examples which we see, more
than by the influence of any and of all other means together, that our characters are what
they are in manhood; if it depends upon these, whether we become Pagan, Mahometan, or
Christian; if it depends upon these, whether we grow up men of principle, or men without
principle; men discharging all our duties to God, our neighbour, and ourselves, or men
neglecting and despising them all; it would seem to be a matter of some consequence that
the subject have a little consideration in this aspect of it. It ought to arrest the
attention of every man, who is interested in the happiness of his fellow men, of every one
who is interested in the character, condition, and prospects of his country, and above
all, of every parent, who is interested in the formation of that character of his
children, which is to abide by them here, and upon which depends their destiny hereafter.
Although we cannot control the examples which may be set before
us, we may in a great degree, control those, which we set before others, who will never
fail to follow them.. And, if my readers will indulge me in a little more preaching, there
is no responsibility, which rests upon us, as parents loving our children, as patriots
loving our country, as philanthropists loving mankind, or as rational and immortal beings
adoring our Creator, more solemn to us or important to society, than that of yielding our
influence, whatever it may be, for the improvement and the advancement of the rising
generation. Let the path of virtue be cleared of the asperities with which the ignorance
and the wiles of men have obstructed it, and let it be illumined by the bright and steady
example of all, whom children from their infancy most love and respect; and there
need be no fear but it will be followed by many, who are now allured or driven from it.
Though parents may look with occasional concern upon the gambols of their little ones by
the side of the way, they may be assured that they will always be within call. And when
the exuberance of their life and spirits have subsided and less embarrassed reason
succeeds, they will be ready to take up the undeviating course of their fathers and turn
as anxious an eye upon those who may come after them.
But he who has corrupted one youth whose examples will again
corrupt other youths and so forward, the moral taint spreading wider and wider at each
remove from its original source, while society continues its organization, has inflicted
an evil on an individual, which he can never repair; he has injured society in a manner,
which he can never hope to remedy, though he should set over against it a whole life of
good instructions; he has fixed a deep stain upon the character of the community, which he
can never wipe out; and he has destroyed, as far as his influence could destroy,
capacities for happiness, which emanate only from the goodness of God.
If such then be the influence of the state of society, in which
we grow up, on our characters; and if such will be that of the society, which we
constitute and must transmit to posterity, on their characters; it is important that
those, who contribute more than others to give a form to that society, whose larger
acquirements and stronger powers, whether of good or evil, go far to stamp with glory or
with infamy the character of their age, should consider well, whether they do not
counteract, by the instruction of their example, what they take so much pains to
inculcate, by their precepts. And if they do, though they should cheat posterity into a
belief that they have been their greatest benefactors, they may rest assured that they
have entailed upon them their greatest curses.
Footnotes:
Lycurgus is the mythologized leader said to have been
responsible for Spartan educational and political arragements.
The preceding text is an extract from Essays Upon Popular Education, containing a
particular examination of the schools of Massachusetts, and an outline of an Institution
for the education of teachers. By James G. Carter. (Boston: Bowles & Dearborn,
1826).
|