|
MARKETS VERSUS MONOPOLIES | ||
![]() |
The
material cited on this page argues that free markets for educational
services have consistently done a better job of serving the public than
government-run school systems, whether the governments in question have
been dictatorships or democracies. The Book Review section follows, and a list of links to relevant articles appears at the bottom of the page. Book Reviews
James Tooley (Cassell, 2000) Most education policy discussions revolve around the merits of this or that reform to our existing public schools, failing to even consider alternative education systems. These discussions are rendered moot by the far more profound analysis presented in Reclaiming Education. With this work, James Tooley addresses a question that few other scholars have had the vision or the expertise to ask: What sort of education system will best serve the public? The cogency of his answer and the soundness of the evidence and arguments on which it is based make Reclaiming Education one of the finest and most important books on education policy ever written.... <Click here for the full review> ![]() Market Education: The Unknown History Andrew J. Coulson (Transaction Publishers, 1999) Market Education is the culmination of five
years of full-time research on a single question: What sort of school
systems best fulfill the public's educational goals--at both the
individual and the societal level? It is perhaps the most comprehensive
investigation of school governance ever undertaken, comparing educational
systems from all over the world and from ancient times to the present. To
find out more about this book, click here. Harry Patrinos and Despite its brevity (running to just 50 pages),
Decentralization of Education is an important book. It describes
the World Bank's foray into "demand-side financing," the practice of
providing families with financial assistance so that they can purchase
educational services in the private sector (rather than having governments
own and operate schools). The various case studies discussed reach from
the Dominican Republic to Pakistan, revealing just how widespread the
practice has become, and how effectively it is reaching even the poorest
families.
James Tooley (Institute for Economic Affairs, 1999) Buy and read this book immediately. Unlike the vast majority of works on education policy, Global Education Industry is based on good old fashioned field research. Tooley and his colleagues traveled the world to study the merits of competitive private education businesses from Brazil, to Zimbabwe, to India. What they found were schools so dynamic, so innovative, and even so technologically advanced that they put to shame the government-run schools of most developed nations. Even some of the highly-regarded non-profit private schools of developed nations seem stodgy, slothful, if not outright backward compared to the educational businesses investigated in Global Education. The competitive market for schools found to work so well throughout history (see review of Market Education below) is here found to be serving large and diverse communities in comparatively poor countries all over the world. To find out more about this book, click here, or read a paper by the author entitled "Should the Private Sector Profit from Education?"
Sheldon Richman (Fairfax, Virginia: The Future of Freedom Foundation, 1994) Richman summarizes the less-than-illustrious
origins of government schooling, shows how opponents of state-run schools
have been wrongly portrayed as opponents of education, identifies many of
the key flaws in the organization of public education, and argues for the
complete deregulation and privatization of schooling. The book's chief
weakness, its extreme brevity, is also its strength, for it allows the
author to provide a clear and concise introduction to the issues involved.
The book also would have benefited from a more thorough treatment of the
education of children from poor families, particularly non-government
methods of subsidizing that education. Edwin G. West (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 1994) Originally Published in 1965, Education and the State was the first empirical work to compare free educational markets to government-run school systems. The book examines 19th century English education in considerable detail, demonstrating that literacy and school enrollment rates were high and still rapidly growing in the early eighteen-hundreds when schools operated in a free and competitive market. It also shows how government intervention did nothing to improve the existing growth in these areas. A new fifth section of the third edition explores the history of government intervention in the United States during the nineteenth century, observing that increasing state government education subsidies simply discouraged preexisting local private donations, and failed to increase the overall amount of spending on education. Education and the State remains one of the best books on the subject after more than three decades. ArticlesHow Markets Affect
Quality: by Andrew J. Coulson, May 2003 This paper uses evidence from developing countries around the world to test Coulson's conclusions from his book Market Education: The Unknown History. Do parental choice and direct financial responsibility, along with freedom, competition, and the profit motive for schools, really lead to superior educational conditions and outcomes? The answer to that question is fascinating. --- Implementing "Education for
All": by Andrew J. Coulson, May 2003 The international community is committed to the goal of getting all children in less developed countries into school by the year 2015. The original target was to achieve that goal by the year 2000. That original target was missed, and the new target is likely to be missed in many countries. What specific policies can developing nations pursue that is likely to improve their chances of success? --- Should the Private Sector Profit from Education by James N. Tooley Professor Tooley uses his research into private schools from around the world to show that market incentives, including the profit motive, are crucial ingredients for educational excellence. He argues that children and families profit from competitive educational markets. Public Schooling Vs. Public Education by Andrew J. Coulson Draws a critical distinction between the goals of public education, which we all share, and the particular institution of public schooling, which is just one mechanism for achieving those goals. Argues that centrally planned state-run school systems are not in fact the best way of fulfilling our ideals of public education. by Claudia Rebanks Hepburn This 1999 report draws together evidence from the United States, New Zealand, Denmark, and Sweden to show how increased parental choice and competition between schools have improved educational quality in those nations. Claudia Hepburn is head of the Toronto office of the highly respected Fraser Institute. Markets
Versus Monopolies in Education: Education with and without the State Public Schools: Make them Private The Weak Case for Public Schooling
Complete Books on the Web
Read the full text! This book takes on many issues related to the
privatization of schooling. It examines contracting out by public school
boards to private education service providers, discusses vouchers and
parental choice, and compares markets and government regulations as
safeguards of student interests. Books Reviewed at Other Websites | |
|
About this
Site Back to Research
Page Send
Comments | ||