|
PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SCHOOLS COMPARED | ||
![]() |
How Markets Affect Quality: by Andrew J. Coulson, May 2003 This paper uses evidence from developing countries around the world to test Coulson's conclusions from his book Market Education: The Unknown History. Do parental choice and direct financial responsibility, along with freedom, competition, and the profit motive for schools, really lead to superior educational conditions and outcomes? The answer to that question is fascinating. --- Implementing "Education for
All": by Andrew J. Coulson, May 2003 The international community is committed to the goal of getting all children in less developed countries into school by the year 2015. The original target was to achieve that goal by the year 2000. That original target was missed, and the new target is likely to be missed in many countries. What specific policies can developing nations pursue that is likely to improve their chances of success? --- Integration Where it
Counts: by Jay P. Greene and Nicole Mellow One of the key criticisms of complete parental
choice in a free educational marketplace is that it would allegedly
increase racial segregation. James Coleman (see below) provided evidence
in the late 1980s that this worry appears to be misguided, since
integration at the level of individual schools was higher in the private
than in the public sector.
"The authors examine a
broad range of Catholic high schools to determine whether or not students
are better educated in these schools than they are in public schools. They
find that the Catholic schools do have an independent effect on
achievement, especially in reducing disparities between disadvantaged and
other students. The Catholic school of today, they show, is informed by a
vision, similar to that of John Dewey, of the school as a community
committed to democratic education and the common good of all students."
--From the book jacket.
By James S. Coleman (Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press, 1990). This collection of articles by the late sociologist James Coleman debunks a number of myths regarding the differences between public and private schools. Public schools, for example, are actually less well integrated along racial and economic lines than private schools. The reason, Coleman reported, is that while the public school system as a whole enrolls a larger percentage of minority students than does the private sector, individual public schools are more likely to be virtually all-white or virtually all-black. Conversely, individual private schools tend to have a more even distribution of racial and economic groups, producing a more integrated environment. | |
|
About the
Editor Back to Research
Page Send
Comments | ||